Thrice White Goddess - Mitosis

In the beginning there was the face of the deep and the dwarf brown star known to us as planet Earth cooled within its creative phase of eternity. 


The full spectrum of life emerged within the energized blanket of plasma that lay over the face of Earth engendered by the wide variants of electromagnetic fields and the numerous unique temporal environments to stand before this dark to bring the light of resistance. Some species adapted - many did not. Nature is conservationist and plays the odds accordingly. The milieux of energized plasma is rich for the emergent possibilities and probabilities of life phenomenon and cyclically transient so as to rationalize all potentialities.


This manifestation of man began at the lights early dawn and Man was there - he was complete in duality and gender as a herbe sown by the forces of the stars. A verbe.

In the early consciousness of men at the spring of light the ancient myth, now hoary with antiquity, was also borne and which its symbols and memories still persist in our hearts and minds to this today - the Great Mother- the Mother Goddess - there was no father just the fertility of this earthly bound Mother; the clay. Thrice fold in fact - the young girl Mother - the fertile nurturing Mother and the toothless old hag. These are the stories of old that haunt us today and emanate from every land where stories of old are told. The first religion of men was that of the Mother Goddess. This was our beginning.

And, as the phases of the Moon have no divisions - as mitosis - the Mother Goddess became three fold in the soon to emerge reflected light of the Moon; her reflection would soon become of adoration as well as of nuture. The analogy of phases were followed and condensed in prime categories which indicate the need for a time reference. Motion was on the visible horizon. Motion being the Mother of Intelligence bringing birth to consciousness.

Then, out of the Womb of the Earth, that mature and fertile star - was borne the Moon; the reflected light - the White Goddess. This early son of the Mother Goddess would become the White Goddess and would later become Horus and then Osiris - that son of suns that would wed his Mother; those 'men' that replaced the horns of Ba'al; Saturn; Elohim or El, then the God of the Jews. 


The Moon would become the subject of many legends and myths of men after the Sun had usurped its place in the heavenly order of Gods; most of love; much of insanity. And later, the sons of the suns; this son would become Jesus, the Christos - YHVY, son of El, Adam or man, to be evolved and manifested as God on Earth; Man. 


All this to the drum roll of the phases of the Moon and in accord with the organizations of each species of consciousness. This moon controlled the birth cycle, the tides, the light and the minds and gestations of men. The Moon is the reflection of the heart of men.

The men of this phase were the pre-lumerians; the men of the Moon race - the Masons; the Shaman; the ones that came with the phases of the Moon and their Thrice White Goddess. Her seed remains amongst us today for these are the 'perennial' ones - exactly 5% of all homo sapien life is today of the Moon, the Great Mother, the Mother Goddess; the White Goddess - a critical mass. They are of the Waters and Their phase comes again.

They know.

As genesis evolved from the Moon to Ba'al to Apollo onto Jesus the men of the emergent suns; the meek made havoc of the Earth and multiplied. And their seed was slowly mixed while the Temple of the White Goddess was destroyed and its Mistress put to sword. In today's institutional and corporatized religions the female has been eradicated; no Mother - just the Father and with Christianity, the son.

The cult of the White Goddess was of science, of philosophy; of wisdom; sophia, the seeking of that alchemy that would transmute men into manifested Man in a complicit creativity of the heart. The sterile Gods of the sun men are without that which they are purported to have created. Their signatures are not false - but their dogma is without essential foundation - the female. And hence, the ones of the suns continue even after 3000 years to fight their torments and their devils in a frenzy of demonic proportion due to the falsehoods that they themselves have created in their unfounded arrogance and desires to supremely rule over their female counterpart & partner. These sword wielding priests fight to protect their dogma that cannot stand the light of their own souls. They remain cut off from their own Gods due to their ignorance, the worship of materialization and their belief in consensurial validation in lieu of demonstration. The current phase is about to take us beyond this madness as it has reached its toll. These are the ones that developed "heresy"; that punishment to those who question or challenge. These are the homo hierarchicus.

The ones of the suns are the destroyers as they have lost contact with their Gods but they remain also the stock of the light; that churn that Tielhard terms the noosphere; their own cannon fodder. Time is in the phases & organization and will not be constrained by the insistent mechanics in quantitative preference of these men, for life is irrational (as described within these pages) and lays at the whim of the Goddess; still they battle onwards, blind and no wiser.

The way of the Goddess lies within one's heart but irrationally, one must understand now, that without this maddness there is no music, no genius, no revelation, no philosophy; no endeavour nor harmony; no evolution of consciousness and thereby no light. The ones of the suns are nurtured by those of the Moon. Shepherd and flock.

In this instance the irrationality (being no triviality) is of the same nature as the Buddhist cadeceus where Yin represents the mists and clouds and Yang, the banners of battle flags flapping wildly in the wind. The right hemisphere of the esoteric, the subtle yet pervasive, being of the Moon while the left hemisphere of the mechanical and analytical represents the sun; both are of one; Seth and Horus; the dark and the light and both will emerge in final manifestation, that is to say 'effect', both royally and as such, redundant. As the phases of the Moon dictate.

The phases will continue in eternity.

In the beginning there was no light; the dark was on the face of the deep. A tremour; a shudder was felt across the abyss and the light appeared in phases to all that moves; light is the product of emergent life; without light there cannot be dark and without dark there cannot be the light for this is the analogy of the irrationality of life itself; life is of itself for it is Mind. The speed of light is thus fettered in isolation - where the dark is one and but opens to the light. Light and dark are like acid and alkaline in milk. This planet of oxygen; of oxidization is consistent.

The phase for those of the Mother Goddess comes nigh the dark ones will rise and in them, they will vibrate the intense and creative polarized light of the mage bearing magik...

Life is after all, irrational, and at the end of time (this time / seal), when Cause has be-come Effect, that is to say Man, the final Man & God, will be the result of all of us and all things.


Or, that giant Oak Tree which sprung from the Acorn, which within, contains not divisions of the Oak.

Intelligence & Consciousness

Intelligence is, or more correctly, Consciousness Is an Universal Evolutionary Strategy.

Interactive self-organizational emergence phenomenon constrained by contextuality

and structured by complicity.

Intelligence is Constrained but Time and Space are its Matrix of Potential in terms of Fields of Complexity which differentiate to Simplicity & Beyond, its Universal carrier is energy, not light (light is a direct result of the universal manifestation of intelligence; it is the energization of activity – resistance - the temporal signature of the measure between Cause on route to Effect) and the law that it obeys are the laws of causality that is to say, the Laws of Cause and Effect. Its Origin unknowable yet its nature is revealed by its signatures.

Everywhere valid, being Universal in every receptive milieu where parochial environments grant Opportunity, Infinite Possibility subject only to Probability in Circumstances, Intelligence is driven out of Necessity; that necessity, the need to know itself.

As pervasive as Truth, as elegant as harmony, the instrument of Intelligence, its virulent mutation engenders itself onto every fertile and ready surface creating itself in accord with those parochial laws - that is, those subsets of Universal Laws, imposed by its host . It is motion – it is activity – it is resistance – it is reaction: It is above all – a Verbe.

Its Mother is its medium – Plasma – and its Sire is energy; its Father unknown.

Its manifestation is indicated by the growth of the glow of Universal light, that is the resistance to its manifestation universally; it evolves in creation; a constant not of the time of men, but of the variable constraints of the affinities and their specificities of the nurturing host and its milieux which are imposed upon by the emergent Herbe. So this time is relationship; that of the organization geometrie built on structure and expressed in surface.

Intelligence is contextual, that is to say: Intelligence needs a context.

Intelligence propagates according to the laws of complicity where Complicity is a vital and hence energized interaction of two or more complex systems which leads to a behaviour that is not present in either system on its own.

Life is any emergent phenomenon with the capacity of self-organization; an Entity.

Manifesting thought is 'life' where knowledge is its milieu. Without complicit interactions there can be no genesis, no creation; no Life.

The Nature of life is the nature of energy for Intelligence is motion and its motion is of attraction and repulsion; the coarse being of the electric forces where the subtle are of the magnetic forces (Motion creates 4 forces); each entity consists of contradictory complementaries; this is Duality.

Life exists in gender; This is not duality.

Polarity is achievement of Phase. There can be no 'closed system' while fields rule in the volume which translate to matrices on surfaces.

Vital and Impulsive are we.

Ubiquitous Plasma

The medium, and like all mediums, energetic, nurturing and fertile. The medium of the infinite and ageless Universe(s).

It is hypothesized within these pages of consideration, offered for purposes to evoke within the heart of any brave reader, the innate element which will become a cause to stimulate an effect to be-come known as an impulse; a virbrant, vital manifestation of Universal knowledge: Intelligence.

This evocation, indeed, will change this structure of cell structure & organizations of the super molecule mammalian species known as the 'reader', as this knowledge can, if permitted, stimulate the receptors of the Intergal Membrane Proteins (IMP's) of each and every cell contained within this mammal - which in turn could trigger the cells effector IMPs to emit an impulse towards a suitable reaction for its future better being. This is how the body functions but, the level of awareness of all these cells belongs to the "I" of each entity, or super molecule - big brained in this instance. We have, within each man, a chemical electrical neurological system which has been reluctantly acknowledged by "modern" medicine through its adoption of ancient Eastern acupuncture practices as well as by other means.

"Pulsed electromagnetic fields have been shown to regulate every cell function, including DNA synthesis, RNA synthesis, cell division, cell differentiation, morphogenesis and neurendocrine regulation. These findings are relevant for the acknowledge that biological behavior can be controlled by "invisible energy forces, which include thought." Bruce Lipton.

During the period between circa 2,000 and 10,000 years ago man had imposed upon his intellect and consciousness the very fabric of truth that has driven his science, his religion, his architecture, his language, his logic; functional emotions, memories, and otherwise the whole rational and irrational behavior to this very day. There is undeniable and irrefutable evidence in abundance today, carved to be recorded in stone, as well as now recorded in electronic databases, that clearly and indubitably man witnessed a far different sky, environment and atmospheric energy levels (milieux) than he does today.

In a paper entitled "Characteristics for the occurrence of a high-current, Z-pinch aurora as recorded in antiquity", Anthony Peratt of Los Alamos, contextually presents this evidence - in the form of petroglyphs - while in direct comparitive study with laboratory experimentation and the results thereof. A perusal of many of the other papers to be found at this location should raise more than just eyebrows of readers when considered in the light of what is reported as conventional "science" or perhaps better described as consensual science.

Can all this suggest "invisible energy forces"?

It is clear that man received his current functional operating intellect (or operating system) and societal precursors at this early time; at least, for this cycle time and seal. These impressions in the skies above of the presented plasma instabilities as so honorably recorded in stone, are easily seen to be in comparitive agreement with the very nature of energized plasma as demonstated and created in a laboratory of Earth. Well, clear enough to raise further but urgent enquiry into the origins of the very essence of that fabric upon which civilization today is founded. It is possible indeed to now question those up-to-now, non proven assumptive theories upon which we today base our knowledge and accordingly utilize to extrapolate our future, albeit in some desperation.

Wal Thornhill opens the door to the future with the Electric Universe which work is of great integrity while his willingness to share his considerable knowledge freely to all that find their ship anchored in his port, must be respected. 

The Electric Universe Theory begs the question: what can not be of an electrical nature which is borne within this Universe(s)?

The apparent emergent consciousness is presenting itself more visibly throughout the World and indeed is seen as a threat to the incumbent bent towards materialism; the latter has outlived its epoch; it is time to move on and as Julian Jaynes writes in his monumental "The Origins of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind", somewhere around 3000 years ago, men appear to have lost their "Gods", and became crazed and irrational. Maybe so, but it is clear that cycles are a normal functional behavior of the Universal nature and therefore should be respected in every aspect of the mysteries of emergent and existing phenomenon. Perhaps a less crazed society would be more than welcome?

The current ritualized consensual "wisdom" of the scientific institutionalized & dogmatist establishment, when contextually considering the planet and the Universe collectively, is that everything in the Universe is identical to that of Earth, that is, those laws of physis - the parochial laws - the subsets of universal laws - or those laws found on this planet, are in fact, a priori, Universal by nature. However, these Laws begin, a priori, as Universal Laws, better described as Universe Principles - which are to be considered when altered by unique atmospheric environments & milieux, as Parochial Laws. We must not think in terms of Laws, but always in terms of Principles. Thus the consensual "wisdom" is dangerously flawed; substantially flawed.

The dangerous part of this consensual acclaim is that this position will remain invalid although approximate while this policy, represents an unholy fly-in-the-face-of one of the most fundament scientific rules which I quote as "...from the whole to the part...". The latter fundamental then is summarily dismissed or worse, even forgotten. This declaration and the necessary protection thereof cannot hold the center; it cannot stand by itself - unless, as demonstrated, and corrected by order and fact, as herein.

It unnecessarily imposes on the future of civilization a resultant error of extrapolation of catastrophic and infinite proportions.

It can be then concluded that despite what one chooses to believe, that the end of the currently accepted high levels of actively acceptable "uncertainty", that is, that consensus which leads to 'assumption' as being the norm du jour, together with an ever so fearful grip on dogma - nay, a fanatical embrace of superstition - at any cost - all in the face of reason and observed facts, can only be interpreted as an observable phenomenal demise or "extremis"; that is, a swan song dedicated involuntarily to the status quo of incumbency.

The laws of the "bell curve" will be again validated.

What is the Origin of Consciousness?

"as above, so below"...

or words to that effect, come to us from the past with utmost clarity.

What does this statement mean?

We humans use analogy to communicate our ideas and to explain, the otherwise unexplainable. We have always done so. It is a language tool.

Note:

a·nal·o·gy (ə-năl'ə-jē)
n., pl. -gies.

Similarity in some respects between things that are otherwise dissimilar.

A comparison based on such similarity. See synonyms at likeness.

Biology. Correspondence in function or position between organs of dissimilar evolutionary origin or structure.
A form of logical inference or an instance of it, based on the assumption that if two things are known to be alike in some respects, then they must be alike in other respects.
Linguistics. The process by which words or morphemes are re-formed or created on the model of existing grammatical patterns in a language, often leading to greater regularity in paradigms, as evidenced by helped replacing holp and holpen as the past tense and past participle of help on the model of verbs such as yelp, yelped, yelped.
[Middle English analogie, from Old French, from Latin analogia, from Greek analogiā, from analogos, proportionate. See analogous.]

As we can see, analogy is also a binding mechanism but, more importantly in the context of this memorandum, what is clear from ancient texts, is that the formulations of the Egyptian sciences were based on analogies drawn primarily from the observed and recorded movements of the stars and planets. That is, the foundation of ancient scientific thought was observation, unlike science today. Through comparitive analogical constructions, determinitive conclusions were drawn for further enquiry and described in the available language that could be understood at all levels of society; hieroglyph & symbol; metaphor, analogy and fable. Today, we have expanded technical languages where each specialization creates it own mysteria for the members of its temple; buzz weords and phrases, acceptable political correctitude and of course, consensus.

The objectivity of this analogical comparitive science were the enquiries into life or Nature, on Earth, that is to say, the workings of the animals, plants, insects and the like, men, telluric and other episodic events, the atmosphere, the soils, waters, rains, drought, agriculture, etc., and the affairs of men mentally, physiologically, psychologically, philosophically and morally. However, analogy is such a wonderous tool as it allows both ends of the equation to be solved using the same algorithm which resides in the center. This is clear, self evident and demonstable.

And, the result of thousands of years of these scientific investigations within the ethical code and absolute integrity of the Hermetic Opus - being both resultant conclusive as well as established methodological discipline (procedure), is realized, and so announced, in terms of functional analogy, that the nature of life on Earth below, is of the same nature as the stars and planets above. Precisely the same in terms of the "Universal Principles" (later to become known as Gods) but also both being subjected to parochial (of milieu) laws.

That which commenced as comparitive enquiry utlizing analogy as its tool, concluded that the reference base was precisely in accord with the subjective target and vice versa (subject to some various rules and parochial laws). Hence, 'as above, so below'.

From the 'given' pillars of established scientific truth, we know beyond doubt that the Universe is made up of 99.9999% plasma from which, in complicit creation, matter is formed due to the intermingling of energy therein. Plasma being a collection of free moving electrons and ions is formed when electrons are stripped from atoms by energy. Plasma is observed as "intelligent" and self organizing - this observation and description from the modern age, is entirely analogical also where the flippancy of these remarks are based on the human behavioural ideation. Recently, within the past two years,scientists created in the laboratory, the animated temporal signature of life as a complicit reaction between plasma and energy; intelligence that was self organizing and self-evident. Plasma bubbles are everywhere; scaleable, variable density, and always self organizing.

So, are we then an electric phenomenon or a plasma phenomenon? We are both, as without sufficient sustaining energy plasmas recombine as neutral gases. Man is energized plasma and manifesting intelligence, where intelligence is energized plasma; is polarized, of the Universe and out of Earth, its mother.

Plasma exists throughout the Universe. Movement creates energy: fire. The interaction of energy and plasma together create matter (mother). Intelligence animates (motion and self organization); cause animates; function is temporal. Our Universe, is an Electric Universe; men are electric by their very nature; our physiology is electric. Our neurology is electric, our language, our philosophy, our realizations, our love making, our humour, our dreams, etc., are all electric. Of this, there can be no doubt. Buddha screams "Know the nature of the beast!" The sage counsels "know thyself". There is no doubt, man is an emergent phenomenonal effect resulting from a complicit marriage of an energy and plasma cause which is currently manifesting on this planet. Our brothers and sisters are the stars, comets and planets of the Cosmos. The variants are our respective milieu and our individualistic organizational arrangements. Life on Earth is as life in the cosmos.

Men are as the stars and the planets. Our natures are the same; we act accordingly; we are all of the same process. We are brothers and sisters. Function in comparitve to function; effect as to effect.

What then is the "leap of faith" necessary to accept that all life is but creation of complicit interactions between plasma and its own constituential movements (that resultant energy induced by the motions between bodies of affinities of 'apparent' complementary irrationalities from where the coagulation and coalescence of compositions and constituents founded in complementaries and maintained to determined harmonic proportions move towards cyclic harmony as stability moves towards instability and returns through chaos and as complexity creates simplicity in order to create again complexity)?

The answer simply lies within the definition of life itself. However, a search for a definition of life today requires a visit to every specialist compartment of science, each having their own version of the definition for 'life'. Each conflicting; each irrationally defending its own bastion of dogma and accordingly, jealously guarded more rigorously that the national treasury. Add to these tomes of dogma, those others of the various and many institutional temples of theocratic piety and then the voluminous, endless and mindless chants of the institutional philosophic elitists, etc., etc., and we find, that the definition of life varies - considerably and yet again is subjected to the whims of consensus, as directed by preference and convenience of temple elitism. Ceritude is clearly not the message of those of Plato's Cave where 'ad hoc' and subjectivity rule blindly in its dank, dark passages.

However, the answer is as simply as the rising sun:

"Life is any emergent phenomenon that has the capacity to self organize."

In terms of The Universal Laws of Causality (cause and effect), effect is the manifestation - concretization of the cause where this occurs spatially (distant) and in terms of Time (organization), both which infer motion. Hence, effect, not being a direct acceptance of cause, which would annul, is disparity, or resistance (being a naturally observable reaction), which demands a host (or surface) upon which to evoke a reaction of a temporal kind (time, movement, space) that reflects the true nature of the cause, that is, the signature.

In other words, each cause (Unity - creation) emits itself - (creates itself) seeking hosts, the result being suitable hosts that offer resistance, which initially impacts change of the host, then creates change in the original cause, the originating emission (cause), which then allows for manifestation to take place (effect).

This is then multiplicity, that we know is - existence (The Osirian Cycle)! Important and not to be overlooked is the fact that the cause (of life), creates life - itself (effect), a priori, but the nature of the host, that milieu that at first offers resistence (adaptation and acceptance - an irrationality, a scission (crossing), complementary and contradictory), allows life to form within the terms of its own basic constituency (and consistency) in a complicit reaction to the originating cause. Thus the defining manifestation of life (form and non-functional nature) is therefore of the milieu of the host, that point of spatial reference, where the cause takes effect. However, that which is created, the localized effect, that concretizaation of cause, is the corporeal representation of the incorpreal cause, an intangible, which some call spirit or indeed soul. This then is the world of the symbol; the corporeal physical world of innumerable realities and infinite possibility.

Or, if you like, there is a planet in the Universe with exactly the same environmental and constituency parameters as to that of this planet Earth, then and only then, does life become similar to homo sapien. Highly unlikely! But even if so, the characteristics of that life form, in the terms of its evolving consciousness, would be totally different to that our own due to the variants in the evolutionary processes in terms of time, motion and space. That is, throughout the Universe, existence is multiplicity, and not duplication! Notwithstanding, its causal nature, that is the fuctional nature, which is derived specifically from the cause itself through creation, are similar and, a priori. The result is always multiplicity and never, unity.

But, one must be certain, life does exist thoughout the Universe in abundance, but we today seek without knowing what we are looking for and as such, fail to see. It is this fact alone, that is, we fail to understand ourselves and our nature, that we fail to understand what constitutes life and therefore we fail to find other life forms within our immediate point in space. This will change!

It should be now clear to the reader that science needs to change course so as to become based on observational analogy (as opposed to destructive reductionism) where the adoption of this precision tool and its practise, took the earlier Egyptian sages to a level of science unequalled to this day, that is to say, c. 3000 years later. Admittedly, the current era of man is far more technologically advanced and this point is again significant as there exists a far distant gap between technology and science...today, as aforesaid, we are prepared with a linear technological language script unavailable to those early Egyption scientists.

The development of analogical reasoning or functional enquiry in terms of cause and effect, from the observations and enquiry of the galaxies, stars and planets, through human behaviour individualistically and collectively and as spread across the surface of our planet, will bring the now vital and necessary major and immediate advances into our understanding and comprehension of microphysics and atomic (nuclear) principles, etc. It is left to public witness on the monuments of ancient Egypt still standing this very day along the banks of the Nile, that much of the early Egyptian science remains unknown to us to this day, but at the same time and with the little of those heiroglyphs which has been succesfully deciphered, it is ubundantly clear that those sages, adepts and masters of ancient times held far greater and deeper insights into the working principles of Universe than today. And, that this high level of knowledge was achieved singularly through their adopted procedure for scientific enquiry, that is, the use of observational comparitive analogy.

The Egyptians had no need of visitations by aliens to achieve their science.

Yes,

it is indeed true that the past impacts our future, but only if treated in the correct qualitative manner, that is, where value is created. Current data and information from the present moment also impacts our future and again, requires proper treatment. How we interact with data and information is critical. This interaction must be qualitative within the strict rules of complicity that ensures experiential creation, or in terms of the esoteric, that we ourseves become of, as well as create - from unity to multiplicity in accord with the Osirian Cycle. Throw down the seven dice in order to establish the measure of the whole.

The Earth is emiting gamma rays (TGR) at energy levels at those from neutron stars and blacks holes (if such things exist) to frequency of around 50 every day. Magik.

Go Here

The significance of the above observations is Earth shaking (to utilize some editorial license), yet this announcement creates not one ripple in our scientific community. It is an observable confirmation of the Osirian Cycle.

No, it does not mean that Earth is a "black hole' - more applicably it
means that our institutional science is a black hole of ignorance
being based on priesthood, dogma, compartmentalized consensus and superstition. But then again, "black holes' only exist in the delusional minds of our nescient priests.

The above observation is a turning point of civilization. Our living
Earth speaks; it is alive and I am sure it is reporting its pain and
suffering at the hands of madmen, those crazed political evangelists’ intent on their apocalypse of their hand. The Universe is alive. Lovelock, may he rest in peace, is truly vindicated this day! Gaia lives.

Now, it is time to rebuild our civilization from the ashes in which we find ourselves today and to begin this process, we must study our past. Not that past of the last c. 2,000 years; that past before our current Age of Pisces and certainly not through the eyes of our pious priests of church, bureaucracy and body politic, which have been the wolves guarding the sheep for long enough, but through the fresh young eyes of those with the joyful love of wisdom, joy of life, compassion and responsibility. We need integrity upon which to build for the generations yet to come and those embalmed with the alchemy of this current era need to be laid to rest in their decadent temples of usury and despair.

Then, to begin, we must remember in our attempted interpretation of ancient texts that there are a number of issues that need to be kept in view until that time that the clarity of what we are ingesting, explodes throughout our mental being; that doorway which leads to our destiny. Also remember that the processes of the stomach and the brain follow the same rules. The rest will follow.

These problematic areas are as follows:

1. The interpretation by the translator(s) of language structure and usage, colloquial alignment, word choice and common usage to that of the original writers. This includes nouns and verbs in particular.

2. The state of the mind, i.e. contextual specialization of the interpreters, if any; the understanding of the logic, theme, subject, etc., of the work being translated, that is, the proper choice of terms and words within the context of the original author. One should accept that the translators and/or interpreters where mainly simply clerks and scribes that understood nothing of what they were engaged upon or, and also, that those so engaged were under direction to change meanings to suit a newly arising deterministic dogma of political persuasion. Later works by independent “academics’, must begin by reviewing the credentials and biases of each involved individual.

3. The ancient mindset or the epistemic logic and the integrity of the ancient Egyptian sages can be accepted as qualitative but only if the origination is from ancient Egypt, at least where the original message was being penned or originated in whatever format. Accept that the translation process was derived from a qualitative nature, that is without merit, or with agenda - as it could not be otherwise even if original materials are obtained. As the epistemic neurological processes of current men is purely quantitative - a state of major disparities leading to discrepancies between the two types of processes and their outputs (one being superficial and the other, qualitative, that is, the latter being encapsulated in terms of density and volume or value. So much so, in fact, that only those few individuals with integrity have partially succeeded where our “institutional” approach still cannot understand or fathom what was written or even meant by these sages. From this, one must acknowledge that our "science" today, is really not of much worth, or merit, trivial and mostly of little value - at the most.

However, the layers of meaning, that is the constructive play of words; nouns and verbs within each section of ancient text, that which we have not destroyed in our pious ignorance and a priori destructive determinism, are organized in a suite of interconnected and inter-related organizations and structures which appear to resolve in essentially analogical algorithms as follows:

A. The top layer, that is, the essential foundation and basis of philosophy is entrenched in the analytical but, of the recorded and dedicative observations of the movements of stars and planets, over periods exceeding thousands of years. Observation and cycles.

B The second layer appears to be diffused from the observations of
active real-time plasma events from the earliest of periods which actually formed the structure and basic organization behind life itself as well as the creation of language, philosophy, science, agriculture, architecture, culture, tradition and social ideas.

C. The third layer appears to attach to mythology of various locations
obviously at that time current in the surround belief systems of
villages and folk lore.

D. The next layer appears to be a connection or analogical reference to the then current (of or around the time of originating) events of some popular importance and significance, that is to say, a good indicator of the state of the then current consciousness, both in language structure and usage, while also being a support of memory in the learning processes of men.

E. Next we see, the fable construct, that is, in the first part, the
training of memory pitch at levels easily understood at that time, the connectivity and continuance of theme; the rhythm, tone, pitch in phase with a non differentiation of mind; or if you prefer, the structure of poem or song or story assisted by supports from
significant tales and beliefs of culture and tradition. That is folk lore.
Evocation at different levels on the epistemic scale being in multiple terms being a priori. And, above all, the temples of the ancient Egyptians were 'living' schools, universities and the like for the training of men while supporting further enquiry.

F. We next see a philosophical construct being developed in parallel
now, that is from the Egyptian end of antiquity, built not upon dogma but entrenched in the continuum of the phase in which Earth and its inhabitants and the surrounding visible cosmos itself found themselves juxtaposed and analyzed comparatively to the zodiacal history of observation known to reside in the Library of Alexandria. Thus
renewal, at the time of each epochal change experienced (from what was accepted a priori as cosmic events which obviously and clearly brought significant changes to the local environments and peoples on Earth), of philosophy, though change, was a critical factor in Egyptian practice; in ritual, tradition, culture, temple and social interaction.

G. And, then we see, all within the same suite of writings (each section or block of text), prophecy and the revelation, which is being based on all of the above relevant structures and founded in the phases (cycles) measured upon the zodiac itself. The zodiac is a key, not just to that to which it refers but to that which its existence implies and infers. An historical scale, which is so hoary with antiquity, its origins have been lost, but believed to have existed further back that 25,000 years from current and should be considered as possibly originating around 80,000 years old, or far earlier. It serves as, at the time of the ancient texts and writings, the measure of phases of the consciousness in men, that is to say, the evolution of consciousness, both in men and in Man and was/is obviously, the scale that measured the location of Earth within its orbit(s) within our galaxy called the Milky Way. Of this, it is clear and that this total orbit being of approximately 27,000 Earth years, had been completed at least 12 times before today and so witnessed by men. One should expect that perhaps life on Earth, in the form of homo sapien, is probably more likely in terms of millions of years.

G. All this where, as the Egyptian philosophy goes, as below, so above, or whatever; men (the consciousness thereof) evolved, on Earth - in part (or multiplicity, that is existence), as Man evolved in heaven (in Unity, that is, in creativity). And, that men would become God,
the son of Man on Earth, that is, both the God that is created and the
creator of Man (that which both is created and creates); leaving Man (in Unity now)God on Earth.

This is called the Osirian Cycle which clearly applies purely and specifically to the basic logic of the functional universe. In terms of cause and effect, as above so below and indeed to all matters,
functions, processes, logics, mathematics, correspondences, relationships (Time), both on Earth and throughout the Universe. This prime Universal Principle was later called Kristos and then later, alternatively Christ. It originated in Horus and the variety of the Horian phases. It was then humanized by the Greeks and then by Rome, it was personified. Then, this Universal Principle, scientific law (found by scientific observation and deduction over thousands of years), was immediately henceforth crucified on the cosmic cross, that relationship between cause and effect itself, i.e. between acorn and oak, so as to support the Church of Rome in its inspirational incorporation as a dominant force of hierarchical political dependency (read: ruling institution by a mandate from heaven), that desired to subjugate all men on the basis of 'fear' alone. These were the new priests, those of a new emergent type of mentality belonging to the Age of Pisces; that is the ones that represented the emergent mentality of the analytical, static, quantitative, or technological (not scientific) and destructive function in men. The unlearned ones of the outer temple.

H. That which leads us to the final layer, that few see, and that which represents the essential, a priori, science of all this whole sagacity and its deterministic construction; that is, the scientific observance of the Laws of Cause and Effect; how it impacted humanity and how it could be taught to all, whereby, each individual, according to his/her place on the epistemological scale, could absorb the realities of these multilayered methods of teaching offered by a responsible central government. It is clearly indicated evidentially, that the teaching methods as well as the social definitions of 'values' and the application of ‘value’ economics, that is social rendering, through the instilling of innate and essential values, a priori, were contained in all matters before the men of the state. Much of this we see, albeit misinterpreted and totally misunderstood, perhaps in oversight, still contained unimportantly within the three main religions (read: political binding mechanisms) today.

So you ask why it is that only few may see.

It is because that mindset, that epistemic nature, that neurological structuring, that evolutionary stepping in men, the analogue, needs to be instilled and put in place, by each individual, and with analytical, that is conscious self-acknowledgement prior to its further development; call it a level
of self imposed and acceptable maturity. Those of ancient times developed this ability, and taught it in their temples and those skills were obviously maintained for many millenia.

This unique mental state is highly qualitative as well as being also quantitatively developed (to a biological and neurological level). It is the starting point for a new functional mentality whereby the left hemisphere (today's dominant) is ensyssioned synthetically and synchronistically, that is functionally and holistically enhanced, with that conjoined right hemisphere in a fully functional and naturally evolved neurological operation system centered upon the human heart. This is the next step; however, it is in play!

What can one expect the view from here to be you may ask?

As you look back down/back the view will not pretty! Ignorance: evil: stupidity: wonderment: confusion. The view ahead will be clear, stable, wondrous, compelling, simple, revealing, and logical (a new logic). There will no "divine" or "holy" or "hallelujah"; no elements of ‘awe’; no understanding, just comprehension and no complexity. For here, the individual, being respectful and compassionate, is connected to the whole and as such vibrates and resonates as an impulse in harmony with the vital energies of the whole Universe as he becomes aware that the parts (multiplicity) always are one with the Unity - this is real science. This is how we will speak, and act; with values. This is awareness and functional consciousness. This is Man.

Suddenly you will see that 'words' are vital and whole and hence important; imperatives. You will see that everything is energy; that you are energy; that today's fashionable morality is ignorance and can never be justification for judgment or condemnation. Suddenly you will find simplicity; qualitative simplicity that arises from infinite complexity to a temporal singular 'value' term (logos) known to be known, by experiential processing within the governance of the heart.

And you find the difference between qualitative and quantitative or the difference between a good wine and a lousy vinegar sold as an excellent wine; you will see that today’s "excellence" is purely ‘spun’ mediocrity; you will see that lies are lies, war kills our children, and that death is the solution of ferals; fools and "evil doers", "war presidents", politicians, bureaucrats and priests.

See with your heart and not just with your eyes. As memory dies as your body rots and decomposes, memory is no longer important; what is important is that you become that which you were destined to be-come, before you die, that is, the completed process of a part of life.

Our future is in our hands; the past lessons to be learnt and not for dogma to become of the ideologue. Life is for living but not for living in fear, as fear is death.

Every man has his own destiny; his own function. Reach out and live your destiny and do not become the vassal of any man that tells you otherwise as consciousness in general is imposed upon us by virtue of the cyclic energy field in which our planet is captured. The objective being to escape to freedom through Mind where body is of little long term functional importance.

"Leadership": The Crazed and Insane & The Cult of Hanlon's Razor

“Liberty, then, is the sovereignty of the individual, and never shall man know liberty until each and every individual is acknowledged to be the only legitimate sovereign of his or her person, time, and property, each living and acting at his own cost.”  Josiah Warren

Inventions and the scientific method of research have so transformed human life that the long inherited, timeless universe of symbols has collapsed. It is not only that there is no hiding place for the gods from the searching telescope and microscope but there is no such society as the gods once supported. Ideals of the social unit are not those of the hieratic pantomime, making visible on earth the forms of heaven, but of the secular state, in hard and unremitting competition for material supremacy and resources.

And within the progressive societies themselves, every last vestige of the ancient human heritage of ritual, morality, and art is in full decay.

One does not know toward what one moves. One does not know by what one is propelled. The hero-deed to be wrought is not today what it was in the century of Galileo. Where there was darkness, now there is light; but also, where light was, there is now darkness.

The modern hero-deed must be that of questing to bring light again to the lost Atlantis of the coordinated soul.

The modern hero, the modern individual who dares to heed the call and seek the mansion of that presence with whom it is our whole destiny to be atoned, cannot - indeed must not - wait for his community to cast off its slough of pride, fear, and rationalized avarice and sanctified misunderstanding.
 

‘Live', Nietzsche says, ‘as though the day was here.' It is not society that is to guide and save the hero, but precisely the reverse.

And so every one of us shares the supreme ordeal - carries the cross of the redeemer - not in the bright moments of his tribe's great victories but in the silences of his personal despair.

Joseph Campbell, in The Hero with a Thousand Faces.

Consider now, that everything is cyclic, but not so exactly so that each cycle repeats exactly as those gone before. Therefore, we can now see cyclic evolution in all phenomenon on Earth, but not only on Earth, but throughout the Universe. Now consider, than men of the current dominant species, that is 'homo sapien s' have been around not just for 6000 years as the dogma has it, but for over a million years. During this time then, something must have evolved. This evolution, or more exactly, all evolution is in awareness alone; not in the corporeal or characteristics of the body, but the characteristics of, let us say, the functioning neurology; the consciousness. There is plenty of academic works supporting this matter so we move on confident that so far we are on the right tangent. 

Throughout the Universe, Time does not exist. Only structure, organization, relationships, synergies, proportions, correspondences, common Universal Laws, parochial laws and such like exist unless, of course, one has a timepiece similar to that invented by man to scale duration, and is on this planet. Hence to the Universe, Time is immaterial. So your opinion doesn't count! What this means is that evolution is a Universal Law, and not only does your opinion not count, but it is going to happen if you like it or not!

The 'attractor' then is the available and briefly existence of circumstances for 'complicity' the verbe of the Prime Tripartite of Universal Principles.

Now you have heard of the Golden Age that has gone before and we have just lived through the Age of Pisces to soon emerge into the Age of Aquarius or the Age of Man. These are phases, remember this, like the phases of the Moon. You should now reflect on what you know of the past ~2,500 years and you will quickly realize that it has been an Age of war, murder, genocide, slavery, conquest, technology, flight, institutional religion, priests of all type, hierarchy, ideologies and bureaucracy, or as one enlightened academic wrote, a time where all the peoples became crazed and fearful; a time when people had become disconnected with their Gods, or words of similar effect. In other words, an Age where the technology functionalities that are now in the neurologies of men have been seared painfully into the electro-chemical infrastructures by Universal evolution and some survived this phase of events and some didn't. We are now ready for the next step.

It is clear that mentalities are changing, that is to say, a new mentality is emerging throughout the World. We see and experience it throught the Internet; look at Google; look at blogging; look at the private space companies; look at EPIC; look at computer journalism. Ideas are changing, attitudes are changing, communications are becoming efficient. What is happening is that consciousness, or functional cognizance is morphing from a 2 dimension or quantitative state of static objectivity to a 3 dimensional qualitative state of dynamic unity where values and integrity become profound attributes through the complicit internalizing or becoming one with knowledge. Men are becoming connected with their Gods again (Jaynes). This is evolution. Out with the old and in with the new.

Until now there has been a sacrifice to the "intersubjective" truth of the collective, that is to say, only what is perceived by the generality of men is recognized as true. What the isolated individual alone perceives, by grace of a higher state of higher consciousness, or even though an exceptional sensorial sensitivity, is excluded, if not rejected, as subjective, unshared knowledge. And, through your desire for association within the collective, you willingly sacrifice your freedoms and your will to this life like force that has no corporeal form but nevertheless is the prime driving force over the minds and actions of men today.

How to be-come Man? This is a process of disassociating your thoughts, beliefs, words and actions from the group; this is a process of acting individualistically on values or qualitative action where today's norm in all human affairs are directed at the quantitative, a priori; and beware, where 'mediocrity' is called "excellence".

You must question everything, not superficially, but in depth; in volume. You must consider and reflect within yourself so that you interact with input data complicitly and experientially. Information learned by rote and immitation (the emphasis in all matters of education today) remains superficial and is not part of you. Morality is always just fashionable convenience du jour and readily available for sacrifice by your group-think; your collective integrity isn't, that is, it doesn't exist except in the form of dialectic sophistry while the sacrifice of your potential, that is your soul, is personal and individual, in heart, spirit and mind. Your choice; be sacrificed by your group or make your own decisions based on the processes within yourself. The 'collective or group or association, etc., etc., is not a life form albeit, is not human now animal' they are voluntary sacrificial phenomena of human sacrifice. 

The future lies in the hands of men, that is to say, you. The current mentality is killing humanity, and society, so it is time to evolve to a higher order. We need to leave the past behind but never forgotten. We need to stop the killing, the genocide; the murder; this is not the preferred way forward. We need to respect, that is, to respect all life which includes our planet and all creature upon it. We need to respect ourselves; we need to develop our new mentality; one of respect, compassion, values, integrity, and intellect.

Murder and genocide is not an option - except by the crazed and insane.

Responsibility does not only lie with the leaders of our countries or with those who have been appointed or elected to do a particular job. It lies with each of us individually. Peace, for example, starts within each one of us. When we have inner peace, we can be at peace with those around us: HH the Dalai Lama:

May 2, 2010

We Need a General Theory of Individuality

Christophe Vorlet for The Chronicle Review

Enlarge Image

By David P. Barash

Needed, an oxymoron: a general scientific theory of individual differences. To focus upon individuality is to celebrate particularity, whereas any general theory must, by definition, submerge the individual case in a wider sea of pattern. Each of us cherishes our own separate, individual personhood, making much of the "fact" that we are different from everyone else (while also insisting, of course, that we aren't all that different). But attention to individual differences runs the risk of being unscientific, insofar as science aims at generalizing, raising our heads above the individual trees to recognize the forest. Yet the need is there. When Kierkegaard insisted that his tombstone say "That Individual," he was identifying both an existential truth and a profound scientific dilemma.

One of the unspoken secrets in basic scientific research, from anthropology to zoology (with intervening stops at physiology, political science, psychology, psychiatry, and sociology) is that, nearly always, individuals turn out to be different from one another, and that—to an extent rarely admitted and virtually never pursued—scientific generalizations tend to hush up those differences. It can be argued that that is what generalizations are: statements that apply to a larger class of phenomena and must, by definition, do violence to individuality. But since science seeks to explain observed phenomena, it should also be able to explain the granular particularity of such phenomena. In fact, generalities lose potency if they occur at the cost of artificially leveling otherwise significant features of reality.

No geneticist would dispute that in every sexually reproducing species, individuals possess distinct genotypes (monozygotic twins excepted). In the best-studied species, Homo sapiens, we know that individuals differ apparently even in traits that don't provide an adaptive advantage, like fingerprints, as well as in physical appearance and personality. Field biologists can often distinguish individuals among their study animals by distinct physical and/or behavioral traits. Almost certainly such individuality is at least as apparent to the animals themselves. Every pet owner knows, moreover, that individual dogs, cats, or horses are not interchangeable, yet theoretical constructs in biological science, in particular, often proceed as though they were. Thus biologists theorize about adaptive traits for "the" adult male or "a" juvenile female, knowing full well that there are only individual adult males and juvenile females—each of them distinct, albeit similar enough to be grouped together...

Mind evolves and not body where the self-control and self-evolution of Mind is the purpose of life itself. 

I, Heretic.

Comment on "science" today.

Of today’s science (institutional); its characteristics and its state:

Here is a brief description of the status of institutional science today which is totally dependent upon consensus for its existence and survival. The creation of dogma is its a priori function to develop pillars of improvable Newtonian approximations and further represents the most dangerous enemy to mankind and civilization today. Scientific theory must be proven through demonstration and prediction and held accountable rather than the tenure of additive theory upon theory through peer review and hierarchal consensus. It is to be considered mechanical 'technology' development or Institutional science but never "science". Notwithstanding there lies deep within the forces of mankind in terms of integrity and courage, a re-emergent true science; a quiet and real science carried on the shoulders of the courageous giants of our times.

Wednesday, August 03, 2005

Of today's science (institutional); its characteristics and its state:

Science today is mechanistic, that is technology or of the machine and not of science; is purely quantitative, incapable of qualitative enquiry or analysis. This "science" is of mentality; dependent upon and protected by consensus, a priori.

"The modern age - The Age of the World Picture" as Heidegger terms it - represents not so much the ascendancy of science as that of technology and the machine." "Step-by-step" - granulations of ideas (approximations - ideations) taken from within encapsulated specializations where deductive reasoning meets criteria specified by that specialization without reference to other areas of specialization, and fixed dogmatically, selectively and preferentially by ruling paradigms (Kuhn), interests and agenda. An ad hoc static effect which negates the essence and principles of science and creates false foundations for scientific extension. That is, nescience structured in dogma and protected by true believing warrior priests in terms of peer-to-peer review, credentialization, tenure and active public relational debunking.

This institutional scientific approach of today therefore forces all future emergent science to be based or constrained or limited only in those preferred milestones of dogma and rigorously policed to this effect. Here is the error of our path - uncertainty & dogma (assumption), a priori. And, due to the peer-to-peer review process, only new discoveries made within the priestly and / or bureaucratic systems of approved institutionally qualification is permitted to be of further consideration. That is, context and methodology drawn down from the professorial elite, built upon by consensually accepted theory and proof by peer review only, with that consensus emanating only from within the inner core of the elite element of that specialist encapsulated temple; a self-serving feedback looping hierarchy.

Everything else is discarded until later 'discovered' through established protocol, opportunity (agenda) and ritual.

Mental usage of the dialectic in language today is duplicitous and adverse thereby allowing the creation of opposing ideas or uncertainty which creates sophistry due to the differences between intelligible responses to intellectual responses. Argument remains at superficial levels [reduced one level i.e. reductionism] of a quantitative nature and transmits only emotionally ill-formed (i.e. without value) preferences whereas arguments and research should find the core for the identification of the cause of the effect, the resistance, the function thereof and the original cause... which is normally found by the same process of the observed 'gesture'; that is the temporal signature. In the latter there is volume, value and significance besides being contextually oriented, all in a qualitative density of proportion and correspondence.

Obviously this approach of science today separates (and objectifies) and its usage enhances the borders of function and being, where no boundaries exist.

Static, reductionist, analytical, historical, obvious, known, definable, knowledge, necessary; intelligence needs a context or "thought needs support".

Mechanistic, fractured, ad hoc, ambiguous, approximate, representative, superficial, objective, layered, fragmented, priestly, hierarchal, bureaucratic, rite, imitation, rote, dogma, paradigmical.

And, by consensus, non-illuminative, sterile, fixed, irresponsible, idealistic, polarized to self engrandishment, ideological, lack of conviction, with power through fear, this science of destruction (refer to the Atomic bomb) remains constrained, secretive, demands obedience, revengeful, rationalistic, sophistic, duplicitous, ad hoc, subjective, limited, 'negative' a priori, contractive, and which starts with the part and develops towards the whole; is dialectic, consensual, with a reliance on words built on subjective and superficial objectivity without consideration for a comprehensive language - in grammar strategizes constructive rules of popular consent and thus being non synergistic nor relevant. That is to say, science today does not stimulate and therefore does not evoke comprehension. It lacks energization and thereby is not in accord with life itself. It demands protection.

Here can be verified a serious difference whereas modern static analytical science remains within the confines of complexity rather than proceeding onto simplicity by ridding itself with its fantasy of support mechanisms. There is no element of integrity and therefore due to the uncertainty of the dogma science, it carries the weight of its reductionist complexity, a priori. As a consequence synthesis is seriously disabled due to the preference for non-connected fragments which leads to the definition of a superficial ad hoc approach to physical enquiry. This a priori approach is symbiotic with the cerebral mechanism which a priori attunes itself to this discipline.

Science today relies on a system of references i.e. scales, e.g. time, speed of light, red shift, meter, absolute zero, etc. Its remains two dimensional (a picture, see above), with a priori non philosophical guidance, arrogant, with the 'Gods' (read: Universal Principles) replaced by men and 'cause and effect' replaced by determinism. The developed scientific state that everything is known [to science] when the facts suggests that little is known. Context from policy and agenda - abstracts that are uncoordinated, without philosophical depth of development and comprehension.

The analytical then reduces abstractions to a defined picture followed by a proliferation of disconnected facts - quantified 'objectifications' with relationship dependant upon linear equational logic. Or, a process of knowing a book by its cover or, superficiality - rote - imitation; that is, the process of establishing dogma; complexity of unknown origin.

On the other hand, the analogue first expands from the image inwardly into far reaching associations through evocation - digestive or processing through the extraction of the necessary elements. Both brain and stomachs are digestive processes. Simplicity is processed from complexity where that simplicity is richly qualitative as well as quantitative though volumetric density of knowing - analogy - the magnetic pinch effect - Birkeland Current (Biefield-Brown Effect) pinch effect. Everything is electrical that is, energetic, vital, impulsive. Drives are evocation from cause; that is, effect through resistance, with full possibility - man has probability wired in - Risk. The idea of science is not to invent the Universal and Parochial laws of physics (life), but to enquire as to their nature and the "facts" of physics are in abundance and need not be totally theorized ex nihilo.

Only such an approach is qualitative and allows an inner experience to be created as a complicit 'creation' with tacit (unique, experiential and innate) knowledge which has a value that can be subjected to inner qualification i.e. "measure". The objective of Man is 'individualism' 'becoming' 'experiential' 'dynamic' knowledge through the conscious identification of function or a continual state of the Verbe and to this end, science is the only "measure" that permits this 'becoming' or manifestation process.

That is, the ideologies or 'collectivism' are useful but are of a lower form of intelligence; an earlier milestone on the evolutionary scale. Ideologies have no place in intellect where accord with the Universal Principles (read: if preferred, the Gods') is innate.

That is to say consciousness is the concretization of qualitative experiential knowledge. Basically, we evolve only in terms of consciousness to live the functionality of resultant but emergent simplicity from dynamic complexity; vital and energized. A qualitative value where intellect drives intuition while intuition guides intellect and which is opposed to the current mentality of pure quantification.

Technology, which today's' "science" represents "Deus ex Machina" is a recursive arising from constraints which in most cases are ill-founded - being ill-considered - technology. Technology is a workaround; war is a technology as is terrorism a technology and so forth; a tool for profit and is not to be considered to be "science". Science is qualitative knowledge via complicit creation within the consciousness of man (or other intellectual life forms that have the capacity to self-organization); it is what men are to become in the universal evolutionary dynamic; time must never be considered as an absolute or anything more than relationships in terms of the Pythagorean geometrie of organizations surrounding structure.


That is, clearly, "Science" today is consensual and it needs protection as it cannot stand unchallenged by itself.